If a contractor commissions a service company to build a facility that does not meet safety standards, he could be charged with what?

The situation described involves a contractor who has commissioned a service company to build a facility that ultimately does not meet safety standards. In this context, the most applicable charge would be negligence.

Negligence refers to a failure to take proper care in doing something, which in a construction scenario implies a duty of care owed to ensure the safety and compliance of the facility being built. If the contractor was aware, or should have been aware, that the facility did not meet safety standards and failed to take necessary action to rectify this, he could indeed be held liable for negligence. This encompasses the responsibility to ensure that any work commissioned adheres to legal and safety requirements, thereby protecting future occupants and users of the facility.

Bribery, on the other hand, would involve an illicit exchange of money or favors to achieve illicit results, which doesn't directly apply to the scenario regarding safety standards in construction. Contract fraud typically refers to deceptive practices in the forming of contracts or false representations affecting a contract's validity or performance. Safety violations would generally pertain to regulatory violations rather than the broader legal implications of negligence. Hence, the most fitting charge in this instance is negligence, as it focuses on the contractor's duty to uphold safety standards and the potential repercussions of failing in