If a subject makes incriminating statements and wishes to leave, what is the appropriate response by the officer?

When a subject makes incriminating statements and expresses a desire to leave, the appropriate response by the officer is to read the subject their Miranda rights. The reason for this is rooted in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from self-incrimination. If a subject is in custody and being interrogated, they must be informed of their rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

By reading the Miranda rights, the officer ensures that the subject understands their rights before any further questioning occurs. This step is crucial for the admissibility of any statements made during interrogation. If the subject has already made incriminating statements, it becomes even more imperative to ensure that they are fully aware of their rights moving forward. This protects both the subject's rights and the integrity of the investigation.

In light of this, the other options present less appropriate responses. Continuing to ask questions without informing the subject of their rights undermines those rights and could render any statements inadmissible in court. Having another officer assist with the interview might not address the immediate need to inform the subject of their rights. Allowing the subject to leave without reading them their rights could also lead to legal complications, particularly if the subject's