What type of consent is implied when a victim is non-responsive and requires CPR?

In situations where a victim is non-responsive and requires CPR, the concept of implied consent comes into play. When a person is unable to communicate their wishes, such as in an emergency where they are unconscious or otherwise incapacitated, the law assumes that they would consent to life-saving measures if they were able to do so. This is because the primary concern in medical emergencies is preserving life and preventing further harm.

Implied consent is especially relevant in lifesaving scenarios where waiting for explicit consent would likely result in the individual's injury or death. By taking action, such as performing CPR, responders act under the assumption that any reasonable person would consent to such necessary interventions in critical situations.

Other forms of consent such as express consent, informed consent, or verbal consent involve situations where a person is able to communicate their desires clearly and knowingly about medical treatment. These types would not apply in a case where the patient is non-responsive since they cannot provide such clear communication.