Which method falls under "empty-hand control" that has a high probability of causing injury?

The method identified as "strikes" falls under the category of empty-hand control that has a high probability of causing injury. Strikes typically involve using parts of the body, such as fists, elbows, or knees, to deliver blows to a subject. This level of force, while sometimes necessary for controlling a violent or aggressive individual, inherently carries a greater risk of physical harm compared to other methods of control.

Control holds, verbal commands, and physical escorts are typically designed to minimize injury and focus more on compliance through restraint or communication rather than impact. Control holds may restrain without causing significant injury, while verbal commands rely on effective communication to manage a situation. Physical escorts involve guiding an individual to a specific location without aggressive tactics. In contrast, strikes are inherently more aggressive and can lead to serious bodily injury, making them a high-risk method of control within the spectrum of empty-hand techniques.