You arrest a suspect who admits to stealing money. Is this confession admissible in court?

A confession made by a suspect, such as admitting to stealing money, is generally admissible in court under the rules of evidence, provided it meets certain legal criteria. When a suspect voluntarily confesses to a crime, that statement is considered direct evidence of their guilt and is typically allowed as evidence against them in a trial.

In legal contexts, a confession is seen as a statement made by an individual acknowledging their involvement in a criminal act. This type of admission is crucial in criminal proceedings because it usually carries significant weight in establishing the individual's culpability. For it to be admissible, the confession should be made after the suspect has been properly advised of their rights, often referred to as Miranda rights, and made voluntarily without coercion.

Considering the available choices, the assertion that it is a confession directly indicates that it satisfies the requirements for being admissible as evidence. Conversely, the notions of hearsay or being an out-of-court statement do not apply to this instance, as these legal principles pertain to statements made by someone other than the person testifying and are not applicable in the context of the suspect’s admission.